Sunday 8 September 2013

Handling Roberto Luongo



Handling Roberto Luongo

     The ongoing battle for goaltender supremacy in Vancouver has finally come to an end.  However, the end result was a shock to everyone.  It was thought that the Vancouver Canucks would somehow get rid of their aging goaltender, Roberto Luongo.  Unfortunately, his contract, having nine years remaining with an annual salary-cap charge of $5.33 million was simply too pricy for any other team (NHL.com, 2013).  The Canucks could barely afford him, and no other team in the NHL seemed to be able to afford him either.  Due to this, the management had no choice but to trade their up and coming goaltender, Cory Schneider.  Cory boasted an incredible record of 17-9-4 with a 2.11 goals-against average and a .927 save percentage during the regular season (NHL.com, 2013).  The Vancouver management made it clear that they would have preferred to keep Cory, but the situation of Luongo’s contract was simply too hefty (Rosen, 2013).  Therefore, Cory was traded in exchange for a 1st round draft pick from the New Jersey Devils (NHL.com, 2013).  However, now the Canucks are relying on a goalie that they have publicly humiliated and pushed to the side (Rosen, 2013).  Is it reasonable to expect Roberto Luongo to perform to his highest capabilities night after night?  Or has the relationship with him and all Vancouver Canucks stakeholders been damaged beyond repair?  Further investigation tries to determine if the management of the Canucks simply made a business decision for the better of the organization, or if the process of the decision making made was unfair and unethical towards Roberto Luongo.

     It can be argued that the NHL (or any other professional league) is purely a business, and the players are simply the strategic pieces.  From this perspective, there is no regard for the players’ feelings or families.  The management does what they think is in the best interest of their club, at the cost of their player’s well-being (Woodley, 2013).  However, is there a line that can be crossed?  Some believe that this line was in fact crossed in Vancouver (Rosen, 2013).  The history behind the situation was that Roberto Luongo was gradually replaced throughout the 2012-2013 hockey season, by up and coming goaltender Cory Schneider.  Nothing seems unethical about this process so far, except for the fact that throughout it, Roberto was ridiculed by fans and management (NHL.com, 2013).  The hostility towards Luongo was too much for him to handle, so he began requesting for a trade (Rosen, 2013).  However, due to his overpaid contract, no team could afford him.  Therefore, as the season ended, the Canucks were still stuck with two great goaltenders, and one had to go.  To the dismay of most, Cory Schneider was the goalie that was traded.  Now, the Vancouver Canucks are once again relying on the goalie that they mocked and disregarded.

    From Luongo’s view, many may wonder if he will have the same desire to win for the Vancouver Canucks.  After facing so much controversy, why would someone ever want to represent such a team again?  Management insists that they have rekindled the relationship with Luongo and that he will be ready to play come puck drop (Woodley, 2013).  In their defense, hockey is a business, and they play to win.  Management claims that they have the utmost belief and faith in Luongo (Woodley, 2013).  To prove this, they constantly bring up past facts such as that Luongo was the goalie in net when the Canadian Olympic hockey team won gold in the 2010 Olympics (Woodley, 2013).  But, does Luongo have the same faith in himself, and in his team?  The reassurance that everyone still believes in him is tough, as the belief in him a few months ago was minimal.

     The last season of hockey has been a whirlwind of emotions for Roberto Luongo.  No doubt, he will have to physically and mentally prepare himself in the off season for a highly anticipated return to the net of the Canucks in their home opener.  Every fan across the nation will be watching his every move, just to see if he truly does believe he is still the Canucks number one goaltender.  If he isn’t able to return to his previous form, then who is to blame?  Is it fair to blame management for making a hockey decision (negatively effecting Luongo), or is it fair to blame Luongo because he should know that the NHL is strictly a business?  Either way, the blame will most likely fall on Luongo, if he indeed underachieves this season.  To conclude, the way the Vancouver Canucks management handled the goalie fiasco in Vancouver was a nightmare.  There was little to no respect for either goalie, and to now expect Luongo to fully commit to the Vancouver Canucks again is going to be tough.  Hopefully, the Vancouver Canucks organization can learn from this experience and treat their players in the future with the utmost respect.  All in all, the decision made by management was a strategic one, but the process of handling the players within the transaction was poorly conducted, and could be viewed by some as unethical.


References

NHL.com. (2013, June 29).  Canucks: Teams have inquired about Cory Schneider.  NHL.com.  Retrieved from http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=675736#&navid=nhl-search

 Rosen D.  (2013, June 30).  Canucks part with Schneider, turn to Luongo.  NHL.com.  Retrieved from http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=675856#&navid=nhl-search

 Rosen D.  (2013, July 1).  Questions linger in wake of Schneider-to-Devils deal.  NHL.com.  Retrieved from http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=676053#&navid=nhl-search

 Woodley K.  (2013, July 24).  Canucks GM says Luongo 'working his way through'.  NHL.com.  Retrieved from http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=678815#&navid=nhl-search

No comments:

Post a Comment